Tournament and draw
Cincinnati Open
Masters 1000 · Men’s singles
Qualifying Final · Court 4
Winner, final score, set-by-set result and verified match facts in one place.
Final result
Mark Lajal won · 6–7 (3–7), 6–3, 6–4
Final
| Player / team | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Lajal ✓ | 2 | 63 | 6 | 6 |
| Aleksandar Vukic | 1 | 77 | 3 | 4 |
Mark Lajal (EST) bt Aleksandar Vukic (AUS) 6-7 (3-7) 6-3 6-4
Sets played: 3
Mark Lajal defeated Aleksandar Vukic in the Qualifying Final at Cincinnati Open in 2 hr 27 min. The ATP Tour match totals show Mark Lajal won 105/203 (52%) of the points, compared with 98/203 (48%) for Aleksandar Vukic. On break chances, Mark Lajal converted 3/5 (60%), while Aleksandar Vukic converted 1/5 (20%). The ace count was 21 to 15.
View official ATP match statistics ↗Cincinnati Open
Masters 1000 · Men’s singles
Qualifying Final
Final · Final
Displayed in your time zone
Court 4
Lindner Family Tennis Center
Cincinnati, USA
Hard · Outdoor
Mason, US
2 hr 27 min
Chair umpire: Scotty Moore
| Mark Lajal | Statistic | Aleksandar Vukic |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Sets won | 1 |
| 18 | Games won | 14 |
| 0 | Tiebreaks won | 1 |
| 21 | Aces | 15 |
| 9 | Double faults | 3 |
| 66/103 (64%) | First serve in | 62/100 (62%) |
| 56/66 (85%) | First-serve points won | 46/62 (74%) |
| 15/37 (41%) | Second-serve points won | 20/38 (53%) |
| 4/5 (80%) | Break points saved | 2/5 (40%) |
| 16/62 (26%) | First-serve return points won | 10/66 (15%) |
| 18/38 (47%) | Second-serve return points won | 22/37 (59%) |
| 3/5 (60%) | Break points converted | 1/5 (20%) |
| 71/103 (69%) | Service points won | 66/100 (66%) |
| 34/100 (34%) | Return points won | 32/103 (31%) |
| 105/203 (52%) | Total points won | 98/203 (48%) |
Set, game and tiebreak totals follow the displayed score. Serve and return figures appear only when official match statistics are available.
Check the ATP Stats Centre ↗Some rights holders keep full-match replays in their own apps or websites. Availability varies by country and subscription.
Result guide
Mark Lajal won, with the final score 6–7 (3–7), 6–3, 6–4.
Each set column shows games won by each player or team. A smaller superscript number shows the tiebreak score.
Detailed serve and return statistics are not published for every match. Unavailable figures are left blank.